In Alexander v. Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275 (2001), the Supreme Court held that a regulation promulgated by the Department of Justice did not create a private right of action for disparate impact discrimination under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Sandoval...
Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education: Title IX Prohibits Deliberate Indifference to Sexual Harassment in Education
In Davis v. Monroe County Bd. of Ed., 526 U.S. 629 (1999), the Supreme Court held that an educational institution that does not engage in harassment itself could still be liable under Title IX for student-on-student sexual harassment. The institution can be liable if...
Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education: Title IX Prohibits Retaliation for Opposing Sex Discrimination in Education
Tim Coffield, Attorney, on the Supreme Court case of Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education.
Tim Coffield, attorney, covers the Supreme Court case of Connick v. Myers and its implications for First Amendment speech by public employees.
Charlottesville attorney Tim Coffield on the case of Garcetti v. Ceballos and the First Amendment.
Charlottesville attorney Tim Coffield discusses compensable regulations in Steiner v. Mitchell.
Charlottesville attorney Tim Coffield explores the case of Bostock v. Clayton County, a landmark case for LGBTQ employee rights.
Charlottesville attorney Tim Coffield discusses this case as it relates to representative proof in wage classes.
Charlottesville attorney Tim Coffield explores age discrimination in Babb v. Wilkie.
Tim Coffield, a Charlottesville-based attorney, on the case of Comcast v. NAAAM.