IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez: Law of Compensation for Waiting
Tim Coffield, Attorney, explores the case of IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez, and how it relates to the Law of Compensation for Waiting.
McKennon v. Nashville Banner: Law of After-Acquired Evidence
Tim Coffield, Attorney, explores the case of McKennon v. Nashville Banner.
Corning Glass Works v. Brennan: EPA Law Requires Equal Pay for Equal Work
In Corning Glass Works v. Brennan, 417 U.S. 188 (1974), the Supreme Court addressed the allocation of proof in pay discrimination claims under the Equal Pay Act of 1963. This was the first Supreme Court decision applying the Equal Pay Act. The Court held that to...
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson: Sexual Harassment is Unlawful Discrimination
In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986), the Supreme Court recognized for the first time that sexual harassment is a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.. As discussed in an earlier post, Title VII protects employees from workplace...
Smith v. City of Jackson: ADEA Authorizes Employee Disparate Impact Claims
In Smith v. City of Jackson, Miss., 544 U.S. 228 (2005), the Supreme Court recognized that the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, like Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, authorizes disparate impact claims. This means that an employee, to prevail on an age...
Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins: The Law of Stereotyping
In Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989), the Supreme Court recognized Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination necessarily includes a prohibition on gender stereotyping. The female employee in Price Waterhouse was denied a promotion because she was...
Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.: Burden of Proving Off-the-Clock Work
The Supreme Court classic Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co., 328 U.S. 680 (1946), concerned the extent to which employees’ pre-work activities are compensable working time under the Fair Labor Standards Act (for the text of the FLSA, go here). The case also...
Griggs v. Duke Power: Disparate Impact Without Discriminatory Intent
The Supreme Court’s decision in Griggs v. Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 (1971), addressed the Title VII issues created by employer policies that are facially neutral, but which adversely impact employees on the basis of race, sex, or religion. In short, the Griggs...
McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Green: A Framework for Analyzing Discriminatory Intent Using Indirect Evidence
In the landmark McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), the Supreme Court described a burden-shifting framework by which employees can prove their employers engaged in unlawful discrimination under Title VII without any “direct” evidence of...
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, 523 U.S. 75 (1998)
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services is an important case in the development of employee protections from sexual harassment, same-sex discrimination, sexual orientation discrimination, and sexual identity discrimination. Specifically, Title VII of the Civil Rights...