Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski: Request for Nominal Damages Satisfies Redressability Requirement
In Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski, 141 S.Ct. 792 (2021), the Supreme Court held that a request for nominal damages satisfies the redressability element necessary for Article III standing where a plaintiff's claim is based on a completed violation of a legal right. The case...
Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville: Protection for Opposing Discrimination Against Others
In Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville, 555 U.S. 271 (2009), the Supreme Court held that the protection of the opposition clause of Title VII’s antiretaliation provision extended to an employee who spoke out about sexual harassment, not on her own...
Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O’Neill: FLSA Rights Cannot be Waived by Private Contract
In Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'Neill, 324 U.S. 697 (1945), the Court made clear that an employee cannot enter into a contract releasing minimum wage or overtime pay rights under the Fair Labor Standards Act unless the release is approved by a court or the Department of...
Hoffmann-La Roche v. Sperling: Judicial Notice in FLSA Collective Actions
In Hoffmann-La Roche v. Sperling, 493 U.S. 165 (1989), the Supreme Court held that under the collective action provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act, District Courts have discretion in Age Discrimination in Employment Act cases to facilitate judicial notice to...
Alexander v. Sandoval: Title VI Regulatory Authority and Private Rights of Action
In Alexander v. Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275 (2001), the Supreme Court held that a regulation promulgated by the Department of Justice did not create a private right of action for disparate impact discrimination under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Sandoval...
Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education: Title IX Prohibits Deliberate Indifference to Sexual Harassment in Education
In Davis v. Monroe County Bd. of Ed., 526 U.S. 629 (1999), the Supreme Court held that an educational institution that does not engage in harassment itself could still be liable under Title IX for student-on-student sexual harassment. The institution can be liable if...
Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education: Title IX Prohibits Retaliation for Opposing Sex Discrimination in Education
Tim Coffield, Attorney, on the Supreme Court case of Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education.
Connick v. Myers: Balancing Test for First Amendment Speech by Public Employees
Tim Coffield, attorney, covers the Supreme Court case of Connick v. Myers and its implications for First Amendment speech by public employees.
Garcetti v. Ceballos: Private Citizen Speech, Public Employment, and the First Amendment
Charlottesville attorney Tim Coffield on the case of Garcetti v. Ceballos and the First Amendment.
Steiner v. Mitchell: Integral and Indispensable Equals Compensable
Charlottesville attorney Tim Coffield discusses compensable regulations in Steiner v. Mitchell.